The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al-'Inaabi Al-Jazaa'iree

The previous page ⬆️
www.tg-me.com/fr/The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al & 39;Inaabi Al Jazaa& 39;iree/com.AbuHaatimEn/1428

So the ruling upon the outward is a fundamental principle in the legislation, unanimously agreed upon amongst the people of knowledge, whoever rules contrary to this - then they opposed the Book and the Sunnah and the way of the believers. As the Hadith of Umar, may Allah be pleased with him, in "the Sahih" points to wards, wherein he said: "The people were held to account by the revelation during the era of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, but the revelation has discontinued, so now we only hold people accountable with what appears to us from their actions, whoever shows good to us we grant him safety and draw them close, and nothing of their private affairs is to us, Allah will hold them to account for their private affairs, whoever manifest bad to us then we don't give them safety nor will we trust them, even if it's said: "Their private affair is good".".

I said:

And the scholars [all of them unanimously agree upon that the rulings relating the Dunya are upon the outward affairs, and Allah is the caretaker over the private affairs]. As stated by Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr, may Allah have mercy upon him, in "Fathul-Baari" (12/273).

And Ash-Shaatibi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "The basis of the ruling with the outward is that it's agreed upon in legislative rulings specifically, and in relation to creed of others generally". "Al-Muwafaqaat" (2/467).

Ibn-Ul-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "Whoever rules upon people with contrary what shows from them, using as a proof that they manifested is contrary to what they have inwardly, by indication from them or with no indication: isn't free with me of being in contradiction to what's revealed and the Sunnah". "I'laamul-Muwaqi'een" (2/84).

So with this Hadith and other than it of proofs, it has become clear that those that manifest major Shirk are called a Mushrik, as this their action which they manifested, so how can they be a Muslim - when a Muslim can not be except someone who is a person of Tawheed?!

As Islam is submitting to Allah with Tawheed, and compliance to Him with been obedient, and being free from Shirk and its people.

And this individual is perpetrating the opposite, which is major Shirk, so how can these two things come together?!

▪️In the establishment of what preceded of the differentiation, Imam Ibn-Ul-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy you him, said: "A. Allah will rule between His slaves on the day of judgement with His wisdom and His justness, and he won't punish except those His evidences have been established upon through the Messengers, this is declared regarding the creation as a whole, as for Zaid or Amr individually, have the evidences been established upon them or not, this you can't come between Allah and His slaves in this, rather what's obligatory is that the slave believes:
- Whoever takes on a religion besides Islam, that they are a Disbeliever.
- That Allah exalted is He and the most high doesn't punish anyone except after the establishing of the evidences upon them through the Messenger. This is generally stating, as for particulars then this is left to the knowledge of Allah and His ruling, this is regarding rewards and punishment.
B. As for the ruling in the Dunya - then this upon its apparent affair, so the children of the disbelievers and their insane, are disbelievers in the ruling of the Dunya and they take the ruling of their caretakers, by way of this elaboration the confusion departs in the subject matter". <Tareeq Al-Hijratayn> (p.608).


[Page 40]

Next page ⬇️
www.tg-me.com/fr/The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al & 39;Inaabi Al Jazaa& 39;iree/com.AbuHaatimEn/1442

www.tg-me.com/fr/The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al & 39;Inaabi Al Jazaa& 39;iree/com.AbuHaatimEn/1430

685 viewsedited  Mar 3 at 20:06

The previous page ⬆️
www.tg-me.com/fr/The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al & 39;Inaabi Al Jazaa& 39;iree/com.AbuHaatimEn/1428

So the ruling upon the outward is a fundamental principle in the legislation, unanimously agreed upon amongst the people of knowledge, whoever rules contrary to this - then they opposed the Book and the Sunnah and the way of the believers. As the Hadith of Umar, may Allah be pleased with him, in "the Sahih" points to wards, wherein he said: "The people were held to account by the revelation during the era of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, but the revelation has discontinued, so now we only hold people accountable with what appears to us from their actions, whoever shows good to us we grant him safety and draw them close, and nothing of their private affairs is to us, Allah will hold them to account for their private affairs, whoever manifest bad to us then we don't give them safety nor will we trust them, even if it's said: "Their private affair is good".".

I said:

And the scholars [all of them unanimously agree upon that the rulings relating the Dunya are upon the outward affairs, and Allah is the caretaker over the private affairs]. As stated by Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr, may Allah have mercy upon him, in "Fathul-Baari" (12/273).

And Ash-Shaatibi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "The basis of the ruling with the outward is that it's agreed upon in legislative rulings specifically, and in relation to creed of others generally". "Al-Muwafaqaat" (2/467).

Ibn-Ul-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "Whoever rules upon people with contrary what shows from them, using as a proof that they manifested is contrary to what they have inwardly, by indication from them or with no indication: isn't free with me of being in contradiction to what's revealed and the Sunnah". "I'laamul-Muwaqi'een" (2/84).

So with this Hadith and other than it of proofs, it has become clear that those that manifest major Shirk are called a Mushrik, as this their action which they manifested, so how can they be a Muslim - when a Muslim can not be except someone who is a person of Tawheed?!

As Islam is submitting to Allah with Tawheed, and compliance to Him with been obedient, and being free from Shirk and its people.

And this individual is perpetrating the opposite, which is major Shirk, so how can these two things come together?!

▪️In the establishment of what preceded of the differentiation, Imam Ibn-Ul-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy you him, said: "A. Allah will rule between His slaves on the day of judgement with His wisdom and His justness, and he won't punish except those His evidences have been established upon through the Messengers, this is declared regarding the creation as a whole, as for Zaid or Amr individually, have the evidences been established upon them or not, this you can't come between Allah and His slaves in this, rather what's obligatory is that the slave believes:
- Whoever takes on a religion besides Islam, that they are a Disbeliever.
- That Allah exalted is He and the most high doesn't punish anyone except after the establishing of the evidences upon them through the Messenger. This is generally stating, as for particulars then this is left to the knowledge of Allah and His ruling, this is regarding rewards and punishment.
B. As for the ruling in the Dunya - then this upon its apparent affair, so the children of the disbelievers and their insane, are disbelievers in the ruling of the Dunya and they take the ruling of their caretakers, by way of this elaboration the confusion departs in the subject matter". <Tareeq Al-Hijratayn> (p.608).


[Page 40]

Next page ⬇️
www.tg-me.com/fr/The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al & 39;Inaabi Al Jazaa& 39;iree/com.AbuHaatimEn/1442

BY The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al-'Inaabi Al-Jazaa'iree